Eva Perez de Vega, School of Architecture
Eva Perez de Vega is an architect, designer and educator. She holds a Masters and Bachelors degree in Architecture and Civil Engineering from the University of Madrid, School of Advanced Architecture (ETSAM), a Masters in Philosophy from the New School For Social Research, where she is currently a PhD candidate. Eva is a partner and co-founder of e+i studio, a New York City based architecture and design practice. Eva’s recent book Choreographing Space, published by Artifice Press, engages philosophical thought with architectural projects and speculative scenarios that offer an alternative, multi-species way of practicing architecture.
Eva is part of Pratt Faculty teaching architecture and design, and has almost 20 years experience teaching. She has previously taught at the University of Pennsylvania and Princeton School of Architecture, and also teaches at Parsons. Originally from Rome, Italy, she has been in New York City since 2001.
Design Studio for Climate Justice
Catastrophic climate change is the chief challenge we are facing today, and yet we are not addressing it with the urgency needed within Architectural education, despite the significant role architecture and related practices has played in nonhuman animal extinctions, loss of habitat and biodiversity through domination, domestication or forced adaptation. Architecture and human-built structures are embedded with speciesist practices of domination over the environment that are rooted in dualistic conceptions of the world that see humans as special and superior to other species. Human exceptionalism has driven architecture and the built environment to be conceived in opposition to ‘nature’ with the aim of excluding all other species from it.
If we continue to give an inferior moral status to nature, and engage with speciesism the way we have up until now, there will be no rights for women, black or indigenous peoples, as the climate crisis results in the compounding of inequalities and exacerbation of the most dangerous forces of injustice.
This way of intervening in the world is leading to the ethical and existential questions that must be posed given the global climate crisis. A reframing of human intervention as ‘built environment’ placed in opposition to the ‘natural environment’ of supposedly untouched and limitless nature, is urgently needed.
Framework Related to Pedagogy
As we return to in person learning and engage with physical model-making and printing, we also have an opportunity to not revert to business as usual, but rather have a new considered relationship with the planet’s resources we use to build models and communicate our built environment proposals.
During the CTL fellowship I would like to address ways in which we become more aware and accountable as faculty and students regarding the health of the materials we use for model-making or those we specify in our projects, and do so by tackling the full life of our proposals to take into account sourcing, waste, recycling, upcycling,
Importantly, however, is extending those concerns to all forms of life, not just human-centric issues.
Many students are very interested in working more sustainably within model making and preparing their projects for reviews, but due to the lack of resources, knowledge, and support from faculty to tackle the issue, they often revert to thoughtless practices and use of harmful materials (such as blue foam, among others).
Questions that the Faculty Fellows’ proposal engages:
- Can studio reviews open up a space for honest discussion on our role as architects within the climate crisis? Can we start by critically assessing the materials we use and specify?
- Can we use materiality as a collaborative tool to address climate urgency and collective action within the architecture studio?
- Can the outcome of the studio (the project, with its models and prints) be part of a bigger picture framework for rethinking our relationship with the environment affected by our design proposals?
Actions that my Fellows project could take on:
- Connect with the work done by the Pratt Sustainability Center and other departments
- Fostering student groups to recycle/ upcycle materials from models and printing
- Connect to work done in Rethinking the Architecture Review and “crit-the-crit”, to address how students prepare for reviews to expect a relationship of care rather than domination and power dynamics.
In architecture we are not really tackling the Ecological catastrophe, and the use of hazardous unhealthy materials for model-making in studio. If there is an awareness of unhealthiness it is always just for humans, but not for the many nonhuman lives we affect with the materials we use and specify in our projects.
But there is student interest. Prior to the pandemic, I was in the conversation with some students regarding awareness of unhealthy materials, and having a system for recycling and upcycling materials for model making, as well as discussing how to hold us faculty accountable for the materials we tell our students to engage with.
In synthesis: What constitutes a design studio for climate justice?